Copper Fox Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

explorationguy

Theotokos

To: explorationguy who wrote (9046)	1/4/2015 9:38:54 PM
From: minder	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 10654

where annual cash flows remain the same but begin two years earlier, an approximation of the improvement to npv8 can be calculated by multiplying the npv by 1.08 twice. or npv5 times 1,05 twice. iirc it was noted in the 2012FS that opportunities existed to significantly reduce the 5yr build time for the 130ktpd mine. as you pointed out the big opportunity at the SC district is the potential from economies of scale, 171 MT of waste-not-waste notwithstanding... so many variables affect npv that improvements in only a handful of variables make the numbers go crazily better or on the other hand deterioration in only a handful of variables the numbers can go horribly worse. the 171 MT waste "oopsie" alone dramatically kicks the NPV and IRR in the nuts. intention or incompetence is my question...can't make up my mind yet.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next