Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (828832)	1/9/2015 1:39:19 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1575389

>> I have already pointed out that the existing Keystone pipeline has had 30 spills since it was built. You seem to be trying to argue that transporting oil by other means is safer, yet we know, with 100% certainty, it isn't. If you have to transport oil over land there is no safer method of doing it than with a pipeline. Furthermore, THE EXPERT on that aquifer has said there it is a physical impossibility to significantly damage the aquifer with an oil spill. So, your argument is entirely moot. >> Why should we risk spills over the Ogallala aquifer, a major source of water in the US? That makes no sense. Except we know that a spill would not damage the aquifer and therefore there is NO RISK. You are a useful idiot, devoid of scientific thought, who can be counted to to support anything Obama wants to do.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next