SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 421.66-0.1%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (110119)1/25/2015 3:22:27 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (4) of 219313
 
Correct in your analysis so we are talking of a huge amount of energy who created the universe, it sounds very abstract, and with all the theories converging into this direction even that it has proven partially to be accurate, to me it is hardly acceptable conceptually for the simple reason of the huge size of the universe.

I am almost certain that the present theories are missing something and the fact that our understanding of physics and nature can be formulated in some mathematical formulas that we as humans understand does not mean that in actuality this is correct, it is only our interpretation of our own observation that may be correct due to our ability to express them in mathematical formulas which justify our observations.

Until we as human will properly understand what "dark matter" is and why it is floating within the universe and not interacting with the many galaxies and what exactly happens in a "black hole" aside from exceptional gravitational pull and intense release of energy in form of x ray radiation the presented theory is IMHO probably questionable even if it is accepted by the scientific community.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext