SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL
WSTL 5.510-3.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bill c. who wrote (8329)12/17/1997 5:33:00 PM
From: Skiawal  Read Replies (2) of 21342
 
Bill, Are you sure it is T. Benton and not a C or L Benton?

Abrams "works on the street". He is from "The TCW Group, Inc." Does anyone know who they are? Investment Banking firm?

Does anyone know how many shrs each individual owns?

I have a feeling their filings are unrelated to WSTL business activities.

I was "informed" that business is, "as usual" at WSTL and the only news to come is POSITIVE. There is no fundemental, financial, analytical or any other reason to support these low stock price levels. Basically, it is continued momentum selling as a result of Short Selling, Two Investment Firms pulling out of WSTL (one should be re-entering at these low levels), Margin Selling, Tax Loss Selling, Weak Price Selling, Market Makers, Scared Investors Selling, ETC>>>

We have been here before, From Dec. 20, 1996 to March 14 1997 it went from $26 down to $8. From March 14, 1997 to June 8, 1997 it went from $8 to $26 and then on to $28. So here we are again. This time it will ride it even higher due to all of the added contracts (BA/GTE/BTE/BC) and alliances (TI/LU/MSFT) established over the last nine months.

As long as I "confirmed" that there is nothing wrong in Aurora, quite frankly I don't care how low it goes since it will be crusing back up like a Patriot missile. This provides a ridiculous buying opportunity!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext