SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (832805)1/27/2015 1:46:03 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

   of 1579809
 
Inode,
If I had billions I'd be wanting to keep it out of the hands of government bureaucrats.
It's his money. He can do as he pleases.

But even that prerogative contradicts the liberal mentality, which is that he should have never been allowed to amass his billions in the first place. It doesn't matter whether he eventually donates it all to charity. It shouldn't have been his in the first place.

Let me repeat that point. Liberals believe that Buffett should never have amassed his billions in the first place.

Hence the reason why Buffett should have donated most of his money to the Federal government, because he believes that government power should be used to prevent the massing of wealth. The fact that he built up so much money in the first place is a fluke, the result of a policy mistake that should be corrected.

He should set an example by directly reversing this mistake of government.

I don't think liberals will get the difference between Buffett donating his wealth to charity, and Buffett donating his wealth to government. The former is totally fine under conservatism. The latter is what liberalism demands.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext