SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (833669)2/1/2015 1:35:10 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1578628
 
>> What makes you say that they will go under?

Looking at the exchanges overall, going into the first year we were told it was "essential" for the exchange plans to capture 40% "young, healthy" people. And if that didn't happen these programs would not be sustainable. As I pointed out in a post to CJ the other day, you cannot fix a bad cohort with more of them.

At the end of the first enrollment period, that percentage was 25%, which guarantees that rates have to go up substantially. Thus far, during the second open enrollment, that figure is reported as having dropped to 24%, a move in entirely the wrong direction. If, at the close of open enrollment, we are still seeing the anemic gross enrollment numbers as well as the inordinately low mix of young people, these programs will be broke very, very quickly after the 3-year period during when they can receive kickbacks ends.

And this is occurring with MASSIVE subsidies by the taxpayers which Steven Brill -- a supporter of ACA -- has said, "There is no way in hell we're going to pay for it!" Which is what other informed people have been saying since its inception.

And you guys never quite seem to address it. Money? WTF? It doesn't matter. We can borrow more.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext