SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TideGlider who wrote (833985)2/3/2015 6:46:33 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1579954
 
You are incorrect in both the premise of your question and in your assuming that,scientists are correct. First of all Global Warming is likely not happening and secondly if it is slowly warming it has nothing to due with CO2.

Fine. We do know CO2 is causing acidification of the oceans and it can be toxic to humans esp to children at certain concentrations. And there is strong belief that as a greenhouse gas, its heating up the atmosphere. Reducing its concentrations in the air would benefit the environment and people. So why do you oppose doing that?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News