SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mudguy who wrote (9213)2/9/2015 9:34:58 PM
From: CanadaGrant1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Hog Head

   of 10654
 
"the actual mineralization in the Schaft Creek deposit may not be as favorable as suggested by the measured, indicated and inferred resource estimate; the measured, indicated and inferred resource estimate for the Schaft Creek deposit may not be reliable or indicative of any commercial benefit to Copper Fox;"

Wow. How about that little gem? Are they saying that after spending around 90 million dollars of investors money producing a FS, it might not be reliable? Or of no commercial benefit?
Two years after the fact they come out with this garbage and wonder why the share price drops or shareholders have more questions than they did yesterday. If the FS might not be reliable why did they spend 90 million on it then wait two years before issuing the above disclaimer?
My opinion is a legal disclaimer issued two years after the fact has no legality at all..... Why even come out with this stupid statement now or did they think once again, nobody would notice?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News