SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INTEL TRADER

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joey Smith who wrote (1564)12/18/1997 12:41:00 AM
From: MonsieurGonzo  Read Replies (2) of 11051
 
Joey; RE:" Year over Year, INTC then = INTC now "

...yeah, I read that on the 'normal people' {grin} Intel Threadz, Joey. Thing is, IT prolly bought an' sold INTCW mebbe 100 times or more over the last year - dunno why he likes to hold it when it goes down {grin} ( he's just funny that way ;-) So year-to-year gains are kinda meaningless to a trader.

You know, fellow named 'Tom Trader' (on the Tech Stock Options thread - he's an SPZ Futures trader) was talkin' with lady named Judy ( one heluva tradin' lady, if I do say so; weakness for Merlot ;-) 'bout averaging down with LEAPs in a progressive fashion.

One of my favourite trading tactics - in a bull market - is to "buy down", like for example, 1x72/2x71/3x70/4x69 = 10x70 AVG when stocks make Hammer Candlesticks at trading support levels or during dips. I play larger swings than IT does, generally - and hold longer.

Tom was talking about (1) buying a protective PUT; then (2) progressive accumulation of LEAPs to establish an investment position. Janko pointed out to me (in an E*MAIL) that buying LEAPs when prices are falling generally SUX because the implied volatility raises the premiums. McMillan's book - THE reference, I guess - says that the optimum time to buy LEAPs is when both interest rates and volatilities are low.

Anyhow; Interesting accumulation tactic. He and Judy were looking at INTC going WAY down from this critical 68-70 perceived support level, with BIG spreads in the buy-points (not like a trading tactic, with small spreads between limit orders as in my example).

Tech Wreck of '97 - "you were there", DUDES !!!

-Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext