SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (838671)2/24/2015 11:38:03 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 1575981
 
Here is how science works. Either by observing some phenomenon that hasn't been explained. you formulate a hypothesis. Which you have done. Then you try to prove or disprove it. This is rather easily done. If what you claim is true and has more than a trivial effect, then when CO2 levels are high, climate should be true and vice versa. In the geological record, this does not appear to be the case, but the opposite. Likewise, as CO2 levels have increased over the centuries, we should have experienced a sharp increase in biomass and again cooling due to your hypothesis. That too in contra-indicated with the available data.

Now an intellectually honest individual would realize their thesis is busted. You, OTOH...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News