The Exxon Free Environmental Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Exxon Free Environmental Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric who wrote (24268)	3/6/2015 9:55:13 AM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) of 49096

I suppose when you are in the middle of a pond you don't worry much about running out of water and do little in the way of infrastructure for those un-rainy days Still, I can't sympathize with folks claiming water shortages in areas criss crossed with perpetually flowing rivers The Columbia discharges 265,000 cu ft/sec, and the Colorado discharge is nil allcountries.org I suppose it is possible, but somehow I can't visualize a migration event that is in the offing there and it is definitely a possibility here smithsonianmag.com Up there, some ballsy politician is going to have to be heretical and suggest that maybe some taxes need to be raised to provide some infrastructure to guarantee access to water

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next