SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (66457)3/9/2015 7:52:35 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (2) of 69300
 
"Everyone knows that Eugenics grew out of Darwinism"
Darwin was one of the greatest and revered men in human history, but you give him far too much credit! Eugenics has existed ever since the human mind and the human heart joined to consider and to care about health and happiness. Plato wrote extensively on it--as have philosophers, statesmen, and educators through all the centuries.

“Eugenics” is a term loaded with historical significance and a strong negative valence. Its literal meaning—good birth—suggests a suitable goal for all prospective parents, yet its historical connotations tie it to the selective breeding programs, horrifying concentration camps, medical experiments, and mass exterminations promoted by Germany's Nazi regime in World War II. Undoubtedly, we have an obligation never to forget the Holocaust, or to allow history to repeat itself. Yet intuitively we have some moral obligation to promote good birthsto have, in the most literal sense, eugenic aims. Indeed, if parents are encouraged to provide the best environment for their children (good nutrition, education, health care, a loving family situation, etc.), why not also encourage them to ensure their children have good genes? If we have some moral obligation to secure the well-being of our future children (a question explored extensively in the literature on the non-identity problem; see the entry on the nonidentity problem), different questions come into focus: how far do such obligations extend, what justifies them, and can related contemporary practices be distinguished, in their aims, forms, justifications, and likely consequences, from the clearly morally impermissible eugenic programs of the past?" Stanford Encyclopedia

The rest of your post is just more slobber flowing from the mouth of an immoral loser--as I pointed out so clearly!

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=29974014
"why aren't we more logical, like the Wolves are?"
Christ, you're a MORON. Evolution is not about logic. Read the article, you numbskull!

Message 29965678
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext