SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (843426)3/18/2015 12:16:01 PM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
THE WATSONYOUTH

  Read Replies (1) of 1575176
 
>> the uninsured rate went up because of the bush/gop recession...not ACA.

Well it was the Dems recession, which is well-established. But that's beside the point.

Please explain, then, why the peak of 18% uninsured occurred at precisely the time when previously insured persons were having their policies cancelled?

If what you said were true, we should not have seen a climb to 18% immediately before the mandate went into effect.

You and the administration continue to try to make the numbers look far better than than area. Yes, there is a slight improvement in the number of uninsured, but at tremendous cost. The more people you claim were helped, the more moderate the cost looks. So, they're ROUTINELY computing the improvement from the high point. That is wrong. The high point was CREATED by the legislation and NEVER would have been anywhere close to that level had the law not been passed.

We discussed this extensively and contemporaneously on the other thread. And the fact they would be trying to claim credit for it. They're liars spoonfeeding the ignorant.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext