SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
zax
To: i-node who wrote (844023)3/21/2015 7:22:06 PM
From: Alighieri1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1578011
 
When the Democrats rammed Obamacare through Congress in 2010 without a single Republican vote, the CBO said that the unpopular overhaul would lead to a net increase of 26 million people with health insurance by 2015 (15 million through Medicaid plus 13 million through the Obamacare exchanges minus 2 million who would otherwise have had private insurance but wouldn’t because of Obamacare).


Fast-forwarding five years, the CBO now says that Obamacare’s tally for 2015 will actually be a net increase of just 17 million people (10 million through Medicaid plus 11 million through the Obamacare exchanges minus 4 million who would otherwise have had private insurance but won’t, or don’t, because of Obamacare).

The CBO report gives a pretty well reasoned explanation for this...and it's not cynical as whatever POS site you got that chop summary from. Here's a taste...there's more on declining cost...but you won't post that I am guessing.

The combination of the smaller projected loss in employment-based coverage and the conclusion that fewer people were uninsured before the coverage expansion under the ACA (and therefore that fewer people would be likely to be uninsured in the future in the absence of the ACA) led CBO and JCT to project that somewhat fewer people will take up coverage through the exchanges and Medicaid

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext