SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (844245)3/23/2015 12:56:11 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1575420
 
Once again, I ask the question. If climate change is a fallacy and the weather is not changing, that still doesn't explain why wingers are opposed to stopping what scientists believe is driving climate change; that is reducing the emission of fossil fuels into the atmosphere. After all, a side benefit would be the improved health of people living in cities. That means that reducing fossil fuel emissions is potentially a twofer....... reducing respiratory ailments and improving the health of residents as well as potentially slowing climate change. And yet, R pols sit on their fat, white asses and object to any reduction in emissions.

No "winger" I know of is opposed to either reducing CO2 emissions or our reliance on fossil fuels. Do you know of one who is?


LMAO. Wingers have opposed reducing café standards for years. I think its McConnell who is telling the states to ignore the EPA. Ted Cruz wants to abolish the EPA.

You're a lying idiot. Go away.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext