| | | Al, here is the April 2014 report. (I didn't find a direct link to the more recent report, but the numbers are similar.) Go to page 5, 2nd column:
Gross costs of $1,839 billion for subsidies and related spending for insurance obtained through the exchanges, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and tax credits for small employers; and A partial offset of $456 billion in receipts from penalty payments, additional revenues resulting from the excise tax on high-premium insurance plans, and the effects on income and payroll tax revenues and associated outlays arising from projected changes in employer coverage. That leads to a direct cost of $1,383B over the time period of 2015-2024.
At the same time, the claim that ObamaCare "reduces the federal deficit" has been dropped. See footnote #3 on page 5:
See Congressional Budget Office, letter to the Honorable John Boehner providing an estimate for H.R. 6079, the Repeal of Obamacare Act (July 24, 2012), www.cbo.gov/publication/ 43471. CBO and JCT can no longer determine exactly how the provisions of the ACA that are not related to the expansion of health insurance coverage have affected their projections of direct spending and revenues. The provisions that expand insurance coverage established entirely new programs or components of programs that can be isolated and reassessed. In contrast, other provisions of the ACA significantly modified existing federal programs and made changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Isolating the incremental effects of those provisions on previously existing programs and revenues four years after enactment of the ACA is not possible. The point is that THERE IS NO SURPLUS. ObamaCare costs are higher than ObamaCare revenues. The "net effects" of ObamaCare on the rest of the federal budget are completely imaginary and cannot be accounted for, except using the fuzzy math that libtards like yourself are fond of.
Tenchusatsu |
|