CYRIX / NSM Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM

NSM 18.27

0.0%

Jul 31 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bryan Stephens who wrote (22145)	12/18/1997 5:36:00 PM
From: Investor A	Read Replies (2) of 33344

In order to understand the performance difference between SDRAM and EDO on Cyrix processors, I used the following components to run Business Winstone97 under Win95: CPU: Cyrix 6x86MX-PR166 (66x2) oc to 166Mhz (83x2) Motherboard: PC-Chip TXPro M560 512K PB cache which could be disabled from CMOS. With Ali bus master driver. Hard Drive: IBM DHEA 6.4GB 512K cache Video Card: Maxtrox Mystique 220 4MB 1024x768x256 OS: Win95 upgrade version M2-166Mhz (83x2) ===================== Business Winstone97 512K cache with 32MB EDO 53.0 L2 cache disabled with 32MB EDO 48.6 L2 cache disabled with 32MB SDRAM 50.5 Based on these benchmark results, MediaGXm-233Mhz with SDRAM might outperform the cacheless PII-266 with everyday applications if Cyrix team added some performance twists towards GXm. If this holds true, we will be doing very well with MediaGXm for '98. Fuchi ... who loves Cyrix's innovations Please support the PC industry & protect consumer interest techstocks.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next