SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tap66 who wrote (9444)4/8/2015 10:16:25 AM
From: brundall6 Recommendations

Recommended By
CanadaGrant
Hog Head
mahzman2
Tap66
Theotokos

and 1 more member

  Read Replies (3) of 10654
 
Well, a PEA is an initial, necessary first step in a long process of defining whether your patch of dirt is a viable entity or not. Todays announcement is good news, you cannot sell anything without defining it's value.

The PEA at Schaft Creek was started in around March of 2007 and completed in January 2008...then we progressed to a PFS and then finally the infamous BFS was announced at Christmas 2012. So a full 6 years passed between initialising the pea and completing the BFS. This cost around $90 million to complete.

We then turned around and sold 75% of everything at Schaft Creek for $39 million ($24 million + up to $15 million in Teck paid costs), placing a valuation on our remaining 25% at $9.75 million.

Selling the Van Dyke deposit after only an initial PEA for $200 million is so far away from reality that it's laughable. 5 years from now after a PEA, PFS, a BFS and all environmental permits are in place, we could start to get excited over some decent offers. Knowing managements track record on getting value out of it's projects I would say If we can get $20 million for the deposit next year, we should grab it and run.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext