Hurricane and Severe Weather Tracking Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Hurricane and Severe Weather Tracking

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LoneClone who wrote (15123)	4/20/2015 6:28:52 PM
From: Drygulch Dan	Read Replies (1) of 26062

The author clearly address parts of that issue. He wrote that the Columbia outflows about 93% of the total amount of water into the ocean. The author discussed mainly US states usage of the rest. Washington diverts about 3% in state, Idaho diverts about 4% in state, and Oregon diverts about 0.3% It also talked about transferring a small amount to the Colorado river basin via a pipeline to help replenish that water flow, citing Lake Powell's being down over half of its capacity. Note this was written back between 2004 and 2007. So Oregon would be transferring water earlier than at the mouth. Some of the article touched on state laws, ownership, Federal role, who would implement, salmon concerns, and why Oregon should be motivated to consider this, and the potential unconstitutional law that Oregon passed to protect its water control. In total it seemed like a very well reasoned out argument. It should be reconsidered as things have evolved since 2007. It also mentioned that Fed had a role in acting with Canada and Mexico as both countries would have involvements.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next