SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (39268)4/21/2015 10:26:24 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
I don't know the details of the case so I could easily be missing something, but I can't see how this is a good verdict. If the doctors were hired by MDVIP, even as contractors, and/or if MDVIP managed them and controlled the treatment, then the verdict might make sense.

Part of the claim seems to be that MDVIP was falsely advertising quality. One case of genuine malpractice by one of the doctors (assuming the facts are accurately reported here and this is such a case), doesn't necessarily indicate low quality generally or even lack of higher than average quality. Also even if it was false advertising that would seem to be something separate from malpractice.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News