SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kash johal who wrote (26917)12/19/1997 12:10:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) of 1573954
 
Deschutes die size is 131, not 75-80 according to
techstocks.com

That gives less die per wafer than you assumed, and no way will they be getting 80% yield in '98.

Also, your cost per wafer is half of what Paul Engel said on Intel thread ($2000)

Packaging cost for a SLOT 1/2 is WAY higher than $10, the L2 chip costs more than that.

With a die size of 81, packaging cost of $10 and no cartridge costs, you can see that the K6-3D is way cheaper to manufacture.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News