SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gersh Avery who wrote (859787)5/25/2015 10:32:35 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) of 1577401
 
The children were observed for many years. The study doesn't say that: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov It says babies were assessed at 3 days and at 1 month.

What is the point of publishing bad information? Good question.

How many children get Ritalin? Irrelevant. Different subject.

How many mothers would have suffered morning sickness? Most. Sounds like you're asserting that all pregnant mothers should be on cannabis to prevent morning sickness?

Drugs are being fed to our children all the time. Seems that as long as it comes from a pharma company no one has any complaints. Maybe we should forego vaccines and just make sure kids get enough marijuana.

Cannabis should be the FIRST thing used, because of it's completely non toxic properties. I can see why someone who's in the cannabis business would say these things, but why should anyone believe them?

Growing Evidence Of Marijuana Smoke's Potential DangersDate:August 5, 2009Source:American Chemical SocietySummary:In a finding that challenges the increasingly popular belief that smoking marijuana is less harmful to health than smoking tobacco, researchers in Canada are reporting that smoking marijuana, like smoking tobacco, has toxic effects on cells.
sciencedaily.com


FULL STORY


Smoking marijuana causes more damage to cells and DNA than smoking tobacco, scientists say.
Credit: Wikimedia Commons


In a finding that challenges the increasingly popular belief that smoking marijuana is less harmful to health than smoking tobacco, researchers in Canada are reporting that smoking marijuana, like smoking tobacco, has toxic effects on cells.

Rebecca Maertens and colleagues note that people often view marijuana as a "natural" product and less harmful than tobacco. As public attitudes toward marijuana change and legal restrictions ease in some countries, use of marijuana is increasing.

Scientists know that marijuana smoke has adverse effects on the lungs. However, there is little knowledge about marijuana's potential to cause lung cancer due to the difficulty in identifying and studying people who have smoked only marijuana.

The new study begins to address that question by comparing marijuana smoke vs. tobacco smoke in terms of toxicity to cells and to DNA. Scientists exposed cultured animal cells and bacteria to condensed smoke samples from both marijuana and tobacco. There were distinct differences in the degree and type of toxicity elicited by marijuana and cigarette smoke.

Marijuana smoke caused significantly more damage to cells and DNA than tobacco smoke, the researchers note. However, tobacco smoke caused chromosome damage while marijuana did not.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by American Chemical Society. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:

  • Rebecca M. Maertens, Paul A. White, William Rickert, Genevieve Levasseur, George R. Douglas, Pascale V. Bellier, James P. McNamee, Vidya Thuppal, Mike Walker, Suzanne Desjardins. The Genotoxicity of Mainstream and Sidestream Marijuana and Tobacco Smoke Condensates. Chemical Research in Toxicology, Online July 17, 2009 DOI: 10.1021/tx9000286


  • webmd.com

















  • Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
     Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext