SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FuzzFace who wrote (40805)12/19/1997 1:22:00 PM
From: AreWeThereYet  Read Replies (1) of 58324
 
Edwin >>

EIDE is not any CPU intensive than SCSI if bus-master driver is installed. SCSI will only have an advantage when multi-thread disk I/O is being used, it also have greater concurrency within the SCSI chain where EIDE allow concurrency I/O in only 2 channels.

In addition, CPU utilization should have nothing to do with DTR rating except in rare situation (don't want to go into detail here). While I don't have a solid DTR figure for EIDE SparQ but I figure it will be around avg 2-3MB/sec. The sDTR (not the 16.6MB/s and 33.3MB/s) given by the manufacturer is achievable but you have to understand this is the raw performance of the drive and real-life performance is slower due to the OS overhead imposed by every I/O operation. Also another common mistake when estimating DTR is people forget every copy operation invoice a read and a write. If you installed the ATAPI devices on the same channel then copying a 10MB file will transfer 20MB of data. If they are installed in different channel or on a SCSI bus then performance will be significantly improved.

aC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext