It's understandable Paul has been extraordinarily busy these past six months helping bring LTE to market, gearing up SCD, researching companies, etc. And his efforts are greatly appreciated by all of us.
But I agree with Acton and 31F that at some point soon he needs to turn at least a fraction of his attention to resolving the complete languishing of BZI on the CSE and the continuing confusion about whether it's an app company or a holding company for promising micro-caps. It should not be both.
To imply that those of us who have held large positions in BZI from much higher prices for more than a year now have not been patient is disingenuous and inappropriate. The issues raised deserve to be addressed, not summarily dismissed. And not all of us feel comfortable "calling Paul."
Instead of complete silence, there needs to be a modicum of appropriate and periodic communication (comparable at least to what Paul does routinely for RW, HTL, IBH, ITM, etc), about the vision for where BZI is going, and its early success with LTE and ITM.
Long-time, patient shareholders deserve no less from the head of the company. |
