SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (182356)6/18/2015 11:55:23 PM
From: weatherguru3 Recommendations

Recommended By
lightshipsailor
TideGlider
tonto

  Read Replies (1) of 224668
 
BTW, you didn't print shit. You copy-and-pasted. I'll copy and paste a quote for you.

"Global temperature anomaly estimates are a product, not a measurement. The first thing to remember is that an estimate of how much warmer one year is than another in the global mean is just that, an estimate. We do not have direct measurements of the global mean anomaly, rather we have a large database of raw measurements at individual locations over a long period of time, but with an uneven spatial distribution, many missing data points, and a large number of non-climatic biases varying in time and space. To convert that into a useful time-varying global mean needs a statistical model, good understanding of the data problems and enough redundancy to characterise the uncertainties." Dr. Gavin Schmidt from NASA GISS.

Satellites show no trend. Where's the tropospheric hot spot? The surface estimate you "post" is just that, a fabricated surface estimate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext