SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
TideGlider
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (182361)6/19/2015 11:30:04 AM
From: weatherguru1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 224668
 
They all use the same dataset...NOAA GHCN (Global Historical Climatology Network). This one dataset is constantly adjusted, and the bias is obvious.

Hacked e-mails showing intent to cool the past (warming blip in 1940's).
di2.nu
junksciencearchive.com

Throw in idiots like you and dumb-ass blogger/writers with an iota of science knowledge claiming NOAA's dataset as gold, and that's how things get purported.
Warmers use satellite measurements using variations in Earth's gravity field to assess the volume of sea ice. Warmers also use satellite measurement to measure sea-level to hundredths of a millimeter. Yet, warmers deny the ability for a satellite to take an infrared picture of Earth.

Satellite obviously shows May 1998 is hotter. Energy in/energy out. It this too hard for you to understand?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext