Zenyatta Free Speech Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board

ZEN 77.48

0.0%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

hoov

techsupport

To: helo4 who wrote (1237)	6/20/2015 4:48:26 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	2 Recommendations of 22811

Actually Helo, I did consider all of his points. His rationale as expressed in calling Syrah numbers absurd would equally apply to the Albany numbers and draw the same conclusion, that's the part that you are not comprehending but thanks for bringing it up, it's helpful for this discussion. Sensitivity charts are a peculiar thing, depending on which numbers are moved, outcomes can vary wildly. So when Kramer-Miller suggests padding the numbers as a Syrah management critique, you really start to hone in on the Albany sensitivity chart and see how it reflects in relation to the PEA summary. I'd never be so brazen to suggest Eveleigh and company padded anything the way Kramer-Miller does about Syrah management. I'd simply compare the two stories and see if I can find any parallels, in that way, I can judge what an article by Kramer-Miller might look like if Albany was the point of focus for him.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next