SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (867090)6/22/2015 8:35:39 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) of 1577586
 
It could have been worse. What Bruce is alluding to is there are several different universal constants that if they had slightly different values, life would be impossible. Now these universal constants are thought to take on their values when the universe is created. And there is no reason to suspect that the values are anything but random. This is considered by some a sign that some higher power specifically shaped our universe to support life.

The problem is, this almost certainly isn't the only universe. There are some gravitational anomalies, masses of galaxies moving in certain directions, that could be explained by a nearby universe that is too far for light to reach us, but their gravitational fields can. There is every reason to believe that if there are multiple universes then there is a whole bunch not just some small number.

So if that is true, then the fact that at least one of those universes has universal constants that support life is not a huge surprise.

There is a TED talk on this subject.

ted.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext