SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
FJB
isopatch
locogringo
longnshort
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (182914)7/8/2015 3:45:04 PM
From: weatherguru6 Recommendations   of 224750
 
After all the adjustments, and they can't make it the warmest June ever? Someone is going to get fired. It was hotter 82 years ago when CO2 was 310 ppm. Obviously, CO2 has no impact on temperature.

While I'm on the topic, here's a global plot from June 1933 (the hottest June ever in the United States).

So, it's hot over U.S., North Atlantic, and northern Europe. I've said this before...in 1933, there were nearly 6,000 stations in the U.S. and maybe 1000 all over the rest of planet Earth, of which the majority were in England and the shipping routes between U.S. and Europe. World-wide measurements in temperature didn't explode until the 1950's. Here's proof of my statement.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/papers/menne-etal2012.pdf



What does one do when you have to make-up data for 95% of the Earth? Easy, make the rest of the planet cold. They don't like "blips" in world temperatures; they played with the #'s to see how to adjust the temperature downward, so that it was colder in the 1940's than today. How do I know that? Their e-mails were hacked.

di2.nu
junksciencearchive.com

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext