They hide their code and data (even though taxpayers often paid for it). They scheme to avoid disclosure. They manipulate statistics. They have misused statistics to the point of absolute meaninglessness. By engaging in a public relations campaign they have totally taken the science out of the picture.
The IPCC is an absolute joke with its review process and deadlines and its inherent biases. So-called peer review is a worse joke; with no serious review process at all. Major science journals like Science and Nature have been proved biased in every respect when it comes to GW.
Today, half the people in the US believe in manmade GW and a VERY STRONG component of that belief is political. Democrats believe it. Because, of course, science is beyond most of them.
And there just isn't any compelling evidence at all of man-made Global Warming.
Without a sea of adjustments, fudge factors, fixing, centering, rotation, interpolation, extrapolation, projection, extension, manipulation, smoothing, infilling, proxies, reconstruction, "reduction of error" statistics, divergence, truncation, and every other SWAG (semi-wild-assed-guess) known to man, they have nothing. Nothing at all. |
