NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions

NNVC 2.005

-0.2%

12:48 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rawnoc who wrote (228)	7/28/2015 11:09:50 AM
From: drkaz	Read Replies (4) of 326

So? I accept that a part of what I thought a year ago has had to be revised in light of new information gathered along the way. With better - first hand - information,.... I have realized that earlier expectations at least regards timing were not accurate. Happens,.... but actually hasn't changed my personal investment strategy here other than to have given me more time to accumulate relatively cheap shares - if I had been so inclined. I'm OK with that. Others - with different strategies obviously have had different opinions on the matter. People possessed of intelligence regularly recognize that when available information changes - estimates and projections also change. Over the course of the last year - and after actually physically touring the Shelton facility, gathering more information first hand, and tapping actual (as opposed to some people's semi-mythical ones) sources,... my personal timelines and expectations have shifted to match the facts. Intelligent adults do that sort of thing,.... -------------------------------------- But (once again) technically the statement I made then that you quote was actually accurate. The materials needed (quality-wise if not ideal quantities) to begin TOX (and technically to complete TOX testing) did not have to be produced in the new Shelton facility. The old facility and its capabilities were more than sufficient to produce the required quality of FluCide. In fact - Those materials used to get the process started were not produced in the Shelton facility as it was not online at the time. Thus - they were by default made in the old R&D oriented facility. Thus my initial statement was accurate. As it turns out - the materials that they need to complete TOX testing (the remaining 2+ Kg) will be produced at Shelton. However, those materials did not actually 'have' to be made there to meet the quality standards that are required. Thus my initial statement is still accurate. Also - stating that the materials to be made for Phase I and II testing for injectable FluCide had to be made in the Shelton plant (specifically, in the Class 100 areas of that facility) is also accurate. Thus this concluding aspect of the statement is also accurate. ------------------------------------------------ You - as you often do,.... continue to try to spin the information to match your personal propaganda purposes. But at least you are being polite & not rude, crude & boorish today.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next