SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : ZOLT
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maverick who wrote (484)12/21/1997 10:12:00 AM
From: Arthur Radley  Read Replies (1) of 970
 
Maverick,
To characterize that "most" of what I cited can be attributed to someone named Jake is not a true statement. Most of my post dealt with the WSJ article and the waffling by one Mr. Rumy. Granted! The FBI agent scenario was from an earlier post. Maverick, just in case you haven't noticed this stock is in a veritable "free-fall" and if it isn't obvious to you that internal issues are the impetuous of this drop, you should note that someone other than you started selling this stock when it was $38.75 higher than it is today.
>>>rested assured that any major brokerage house has done enough homework not to be duped>>>
Maverick, you need to sell that story to Lehman Brother and Solomon Bros. on their hyping BRE-X before it became the scandal stock of 1997. I'm sure they need all the moral support that they can get from you since the disgruntled shareholders that bought on their advice now have one of the largest class-action suits in the history of Wall Street.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News