SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longz
To: Boolish who wrote (170574)8/12/2015 3:49:15 PM
From: heinz441 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 233883
 
"The Company has, for the first time, engaged commercial epitaxial wafer suppliers in providing wafers with the unique and proprietary POET epitaxial stack. While comprehensive discussions are underway with a number of potential foundry and epitaxial wafer partners, we have recently signed memorandums of understanding with some of these companies and expect to continue this process."

The news release clearly speaks about multiple wafer suppliers. POET Technologies obviously "has engaged" (whatever that means legally) with some of them, while POET is in "comprehensive discussions" with other wafer suppliers. Multiple wafer suppliers? This does not sound like satisfying just the demand of the lab and the lab-to-fab project and nothing else!

However, there's another group of companies mentioned in the news release: the foundry partners. These are the guys who actually produce the chips. They are in need for POET wafers, because they are (resp. will be) "printing" the chip circuitry onto those wafers.

To me, this looks like POET is setting up a Fab 2.0 ecosystem for the to-be-revealed POET semiverse: with companies supplying POET wafers to anyone who need them, companies producing chips out of these wafers, companies designing chips etc. And their (our) IP is everywhere! I like it!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext