Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (882811)	8/26/2015 7:55:44 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1587359

>> with the peer review Peer review is a joke. michaeleisen.org "I confess, I wrote the Arsenic DNA paper to expose flaws in peer-review at subscription based journals" And lest you think the IPCC is better, you'd better think again. It is worse than the lot. Problems from top to bottom since its inception. It is a total fraud. Peer review is worse than worthless. It provides false sense of security and turns mere mistakes into absolute frauds. As to the 97%, it is dead and buried. There are innumerable scholarly articles which you can get by googling it that debunk it (as it turns out, those who are trying to expose the fraud don't mind showing their work like the fraudsters do). If you need them. The Gold Standard of these articles is "Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change David R. Legates, Willie Soon, William M. Briggs, Christopher Monckton of Brenchley." Not that it means a damned thing to you or ever will.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next