"Why is the "Journal of Science" a cartoon?"
Besides your sneer about Adam, it's rather obvious that a cartoon illustration, is well,... a cartoon. Are you an idiot?... Never mind.
"How is a scientific illustration from the "Journal of Science" a cartoon??"
If you can't figure out how a cartoon illustration is anything but a cartoon, then you ARE an idiot.
Why do you hate science so much? If you were really interested in science and finding the truth, you would not a priori reject all counterfactual data. The fact that you do, is all the proof we need to know, that all your bleatings for "Science" are at best insincere and in all probability, dishonest. It might very well be true that all your assumptions about the universe being billions of years old, may in fact be false, but you'll never know and obviously, you'll never care to. You have your anti Christian cartoon story and you're sticking to it, we get that, just don't pretend it's "Science".
"Firstly, they are not assumptions. It is SCIENCE."
Thank you Thomas Dolby. You are an idiot and a dishonest one to boot! If you can't account for soft tissue surviving in fossils for 80 million years, you may have to re examine your methods of dating rocks and yes, your assumptions. |
