SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184717)9/4/2015 6:34:52 PM
From: rayrohn5 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
isopatch
locogringo
MJ
TideGlider

   of 224755
 
really Kenny u can't be that stupid and be a 1/2 way decent attorney ...

my Grandfather was an Attorney
my Father was an Attorney ----- the crap u post here they are both laugh'n there asses off in their graves

Martin Armstrong "Astonished" At Hillary Email Scandal


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/04/2015 17:30 -0400

Martin Armstrong national security

Submitted by Martin Armstrong via ArmstrongEconomics.com,



The most incredible aspect of Hillary’s e-mail scandal is the media’s total dismissal of a simple factHillary DID NOT use the government’s e-mail system — she used her own. She claimed she was unaware that you could have two e-mails on one phone. That alone shows that she is not qualified to be president.

Nonetheless, that can ONLY mean that she sent top-secret e-mails through her personal e-mail service. All of her discussions with foreign governments whom donated to her charity were also in her private e-mails.

If you work for the government and opt to send all OFFICIAL e-mails through your private unsecured server because you assumed you could only have one: wouldn’t you assume that national security comes before personal e-mails?

This is just amazing. Obviously, Hillary has lied about the e-mails for how did she conduct business as part of her job without using a government system? If you had to choose between the two, it would seem that the country should come first.

Now her staff is taking the Fifth Amendment and refusing to testify. Obviously, the only reason to take the Fifth requires the risk of a crime.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext