SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB
ZEN.V 1.170+0.9%Oct 31 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: the Chief who wrote (2974)9/10/2015 9:12:26 AM
From: Glazeddonut1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GMPInvestor

  Read Replies (2) of 5988
 
Actually I think you might be wrong chief.The material news is on the part of both parties.As the news states and hoov pointed out.

"iii) not to sell, transfer, gift, assign pledge, hypothecate the common shares for a three-year period without the prior written consent of Canada Carbon (other than as permitted in the voting agreement),"

So in order for UBR to sell the shares written consent must have been given late 2013 or so same time the Bob greenfield other alias's appeared on stockhouse.Since their is no news confirming this pinning a date down might be hard.Since stockwatch still shjows no record of transactions. UBR has shown in its SEDARS a disposition over a period of time of its shares.No matter how you try to spin this a agreement involving stock in a sale of a property being amended is MATERIAL news.Both companies dropped the ball telling shareholders imo.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News