SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (886705)9/10/2015 7:46:20 PM
From: work4ever  Read Replies (1) of 1574005
 
Has it been shown that she improperly handled classified materials? So far there is no evidence she did. There have been some claims that happened, but they don't seem to be backed by any proof that it was classified at the time she handled it. I know Fox has been trying to make the case, but
It has been reported (obviously I have no inside information) that she had on her private server intelligence that could only be derived from USA spy satellites. This would be one of the two messages that the IGs said should be classified TS. It is actually classified beyond TS, with the TK (Talent Keyhole) caveat. Such intelligence originates from one of two agencies: NRO or NGA. It is classified (and marked) on origination. It would never leave either of those agencies without being properly classified and marked.

If you will admit that you don't give a damn what she did, and will vote for any nominee with a D after their name, I will chase down some links for you. Otherwise, you're on your own.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News