SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB Free Speech Board
CCB 104.51-0.9%Oct 30 3:59 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: hoov9/12/2015 9:08:23 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 537
 
Doc (I'm sure you'll let me call you that, considering how fond you are of the honorific)....Doc, you don't know what you're talking about (as usual). My comments in bold.

Message 30228255
CCB has a fiduciary duty to protect it's shareholders and if they changed a major agreement where a holder of 5M shares can now sell when they were legally bound to hold the shares, shareholders had a right to know that!

No. In Canada, there is no fiduciary duty to shareholders. The fiduciary duty is to the Corporation. The Supreme Court ruled on that in the BCE v. Bondholders suit.

Your assumption that CCB changed the agreement is defamatory on its face. Canada Carbon's duty under continuous disclosure obligations was to report on the status of the Asbury acquisition. It was UBR's duty to disclose their management of the asset which they acquired, the CCB shares and cash.

Canada Carbon had not knowledge that UBR was selling its CCB shares. Unless you can show otherwise, you should retract your allegation.

It is clear that you have no idea what information meets the test of materiality. You lied to Bruce and Olga, as you attempted to advance your marijuana project, Cannacure. You falsely reported that you had contracted control of the bricks and mortar facility, and that you had rezoning in hand. You misrepresented your costs, your investments, and your revenue in your pro forma financials, which changed every time they were submitted. You violated the exclusivity terms of the Letter of Intent, among others. And, now that they have walked away from your deal, you choose to denigrate them in public? You wanted what they had earned: salaries commensurate with their life skills. You expected a fast track to being wealthy, without having earned it. And, in return for the investment in your future arising from the work of Bruce, Olga, and myself, you wish to throw us all under the bus? You didn't even have the courtesy to thank us for what we tried to do for you.


Message 30228190

So, what do you call a child who continually insults and agitates another kid in the school yard but when the kid comes over to him, he runs and hides under the teacher's skirt?

Bully and Coward comes to mind for me...

Except in this case, it is a pretentious adult who thinks the Peel police have a bodyguard division LMAO.

Poking a bear who does not care for rules much is quite stupid.

What do you call a medical professional who supports threats being made against his patients, without reporting those threats to the authorities?

Why would we need a triage facility at the golf tournament? Shall I post fTN's threats?

Who is being bullied?

Lar
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext