SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Brumar89
THE WATSONYOUTH
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (888920)9/18/2015 4:00:48 PM
From: TimF2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 1576336
 
The amount produced by wind is a small fraction of electricity production.

That's despite heavy subsidies in many places.

CA got 11 gigawatts from solar in 2014

Gigawatts are irrelevant. Gigawatt hours are what's important and a lot of them. The US uses petawatt-hours of electricity. For 2014 less then 5 percent of that was from wind. Sometime this century world total energy use could reach the exa-watt range. Wind is a small factor.

Its an even smaller factor if you consider the ares to which oil through the pipeline can be put to use. It mostly would be used to power cars and trucks. Electric cars and trucks are a fraction of one percent of the US car and truck fleet, and probably represent and even smaller percentage of the number of miles driven. Wind power is less then 5 percent of electricity production in the US. Wind power powers something on the order of a part per twenty thousand of US car and truck miles.

For the non-transportation uses of the oil, wind power is not just a tiny niche player, it isn't a player at all. You can't use it as feed stock for plastics, or to lubricate your engine.

To put it simply wind power is irrelevant to Keystone XL
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext