Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (185682)	10/13/2015 12:25:36 PM
From: weatherguru	5 Recommendations of 224775

True dat; I see what you are saying. I'll elaborate a little more just to share. The average temperature of Earth doesn't even emit radiation in the absorption band of CO2. The only place where infrared radiation emitted is within the absorption band of CO2 is in the polar regions & sea ice (~12-17 micrometers). Has there been any correlation of sea-ice and CO2? Nope. How about Arctic/Antarctic temperatures and CO2? Nope. Otherwise, CO2 is just there...invisible and odorless. Water vapor rules the roost, which is related to ocean circulation patterns. Regarding the butterfly effect in models. Initial warming is easily offset by cloud formation. To have a programmed runaway greenhouse effect, the models must inhibit convection. This is done by creating an upper-tropospheric "hot spot" in the tropics. This "hot spot" ensures less convection and less formation of clouds. Again, 100% of the climate models create a "hot spot", because this is the only way to have a runaway greenhouse effect. A "hot spot" has never been observed.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next