SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bearshark who wrote (12184)12/23/1997 11:15:00 AM
From: Defrocked  Read Replies (1) of 94695
 
RE:"look towards 2002"

An interesting counter-argument has been advanced
by a noted international economist to justify the
historically high valuations currently exhibited by the stock
market as a whole. The logic is that the gradualistic
monetary policy enacted under Chairman Greenspan has
reduced the variance of equity discount rates since periods
of major tightening or loosening will no longer occur.
Thus higher P/E's are rational since the earnings
stream is more predictable and business cycles are
considered a phenomenon of the past or greatly discounted
by market participants.

My response is that business cycles have only been
"repealed" to the extent that "gradualism" has been
institutionalized at the Fed. Otherwise, P/E's deserve
higher than normal valuations only until AG retires. Projected
P/E's after the year 2000 should rediscount historical uncertainty.
Dr. Greenspan may elect to retire at the end of his third
four-year term as Chairman of the Board of Governors
ending June 20, 2000. AG will be 74 years old then.

Another reason we may have Y2K problems!<g>

Happy Holidays everyone.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext