The climate changes. It always has. It always will. Humans don't cause that.
That's not saying humans have no impact... or that there are not other good reasons to seek to obviate our use of fossil fuels as fuels... but, the CHOICE that has been made, to approach that goal in a particular way, was a POLITICAL choice... to structure particular "enemies" and particular political arguments... that happen to array along particular POLITICAL lines... having NOTHING to do with facts or science... but everything to do with politics and $. Which businesses fail, and which succeed, it turns out, when there isn't a proper free market function... is a function of politics. And, the flows of money into politics... and the flows of policy out of politics... depends on the politics of those who are made the winners and losers. There IS an agenda... and the idiots who are prosecuting that agenda as "global warming"... have deliberately chosen an untenable position... which the REAL science is rapidly proving to be bullshit. Reality is not going to cooperate with their choice... just because they insist it must.
The political reality... is that it was a known, at the time the choice was made... that there was a finite amount of time in which the political argument had to be won... in order to NOT have the weight of reality, with accumulating evidence, tip hard against those who are arguing, today, the modern equivalent of earth being at the center of the universe.
Why is the "science" settled... when they're repeatedly proven wrong in all their predictions ? LOL!!!
The only reason the science is "settled"... as a political argument... is that those losing the argument with the facts... don't benefit from having more facts proving them wrong. Of course, anyone arguing that the "science is settled"... is NOT arguing about the science... as that argument in itself is anti-scientific.
The goal posts keep moving. And, there's a reason for that... Which doesn't mean those who are being backed up into "adjusting" their arguments as they go... including cooking the data as required to get the answers they desire... are EVER going to admit they're lying ?
The political reality, now... is that the political fraud of global warming has already failed... and the fraud in the science that enabled it is rapidly unraveling... It doesn't matter how many hollywood actresses choose to believe what the left tells them to believe. It doesn't matter how many "scientists" paid through political patronage... support the "error" (in quotes... as error assumes a lack of intent). The science isn't "won" because the church works to enlist more "scientists" to vote against Galileo...
The rest... is social engineering and team sports... which is all you're doing. You've demonstrated ZERO ability to understand any science... you're just a political hack and a shill... pandering to those who already believe "oil companies are evil"... which, true or not, isn't in the least bit relevant. Or, it's only relevant in the political construct... proving, again, that what you are doing is politics, and not science.
"Global Warming" is a political creation... that has been enabled for political purposes... having NOTHING to do with "science"... other than in relation to the $ that is used in CO-OPTING "science" to support the political agenda... using a checkbook... as politicians continue assuming whores will be whores. There is no moral superiority that exists in any competition between Exxon's whores versus Al Gore's.
What that leaves, still, is the obvious in the claim humans are THE cause of change... which is total bullshit.
The evidence (real science... not political opinion) also shows no reason to think CO2 has any causal influence on any changes that are occurring. But, perhaps there are other things humans are doing that might have vastly more influence than CO2 ? If that were true... wouldn't it be really, really, really important to understand what those things were ?
The evidence shows CO2 has always been a LAGGING factor with a warming planet generating more CO2 following the fact of warming events. The only CAUSAL link that the DATA can be used to generate (and I'm not saying that would be a valid conclusion to draw, only because the "cause and effect" do occur in the proper sequence)... shows rising CO2 levels, following global warming events, PRECEDE subsequent cooling events...
To "win" the global warming argument... the advocates of anthropogenic warming are going to have to prove that over millions of years of history, dating long before humans were around... the climate has always warmed up in ANTICIPATION of higher future CO2 levels... to show the warming occurred because of the CO2. Don't think they won't try.
|
