Omar,
My, my, my, how your English, grammar, sentence structure and spelling have improved since your last posting. It makes wonder if you aren't two different people.
"We are also surprised that you would withhold this information from the net. it does appear by disclosing 1/2 truths that the agenda you and others pursue definately appears biased with extreme prejudice to this writer".
If you take the time to read Offie's postings, you will see that he refers to the satisfaction of judgment not once, but twice (in the introductory posting and the civil proceedings posting). As I recall from actually reading Offie's postings, he never refered to you, Omar. He did refer to Allen L. Burditt, II. Why would you say that this is "biased with extreme prejudice to this writer"? Unless, of course, you are in reality none other than the same Allen L. Burditt, II. If so, why don't you post under your own name? I am certain that many of Oilex shareholders would like to engage you in conversation.
You say that this lawsuit has nothing to do with Oilex. If my memory serves me correctly, Mr. Burditt was on probation for two felony convictions for violating security laws when "Phoenix Reserves Inc acquired it's majority stock position in oilex in November 1994". That isn't relevant? I believe that most shareholders think it is. |