<How? Let me get this right. You start up IE, go to SI, see one of my rantings, hit reply, and decide you'd like to take it to private email. You hit the Justin Banks linked text at the top of my page and start Eudora? How?>
View, Internet options, programs.
<I'm not even going to try to respond to this. If you think MSFT has more closely conformed to the HTML RFCs than NSCP, you go right ahead and think that.>
That's what I thought you would say.
<o I've not heard this before, do you have documentation on this?>
That's unfortunate, for this is third time I am posting it to you. now you see why I say you are refusing ot listen. Go to the NSCP site and read the fine print on the Enterprise Server and old Live Wire documentation.
<Anyone using a GUI to admin a server gets what they deserve.>
Would you accept that as an acceptable excuse for all of those bitching about MSFT browser software?
<Of course, if what you say is true (somehow I doubt it), and NSCP does require the use of their browser to do something, I agree that it's bad for the consumer and bad for progress.>
My problem is not with the pereceptionof progress, but with selective prosecution. NSCP who had majority marketshare has been pulling these stunts for some time. That's cool, but IF MSFT can't do it, NSCP shouldn't be able to do it either. |
