SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Chris A. who wrote (4192)12/23/1997 5:37:00 PM
From: hurricane  Read Replies (1) of 10836
 
Hello KRY'ers!!! Long Kry (still), but developments on both this and the SH thread are a disturbing reminder of the old NPA (Northrich Pacific) thread.

Anyone who has any disagreement is immediately tarred and feathered by (supposedly heavy longs) as either a shorter or (gasp!) working for PDG!!!!

What rubbish! Most regular posters on the SH forum have never been involved with junior mining shares before and thus are quick to dismiss naysayers as the above.

Perhaps a feware, and perhaps their cautionary notes should be payed more attention. After all we have won previously in he SCJ and so why this delay? Isn't the Court interested in a quick affirmation of their prior decisions? Normally, you would expect this to be the case, but here nothing is as it appears.

Quite obviously the political powers are fighting a massive behind the scenes battle over these properties! Why else the postponement until the new year? We were to have the decision in late September, then November, then before Christmas (1997 that is!). Where are we now? The same as before!

KRY has added some powerful allies to its team, but at what price to us paying shareholders!? No one likes to talk about what compensation Paris and his family will receive.........at our expense of course! And mark my word, it will cost us dearly.

This delay will see us receive (if and when we win) decidedly lessthan before. It will cost us.

A buyout of C$30-C$35 was probable before, now C$20-C$23 is more likely.

The procrastination of the Court plus the POG have cost us, plus the payoffs as yet not public.

Sorry for the long post, but I call it as I see it.

Long KRY.

But why is this decision always ­ma¤ana!??????

Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext