Copper Fox Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

biggerbob68

Slushie

To: Underhill69 who wrote (9731)	11/28/2015 10:21:17 PM
From: louel	2 Recommendations of 10654

Only read what is in red. That is the important part of the statement. Leave out the black print it is subject to protecting the company rights and reputation. Companies do what it can to project an image of honesty and fairness . Doing otherwise instills a segment of distrust in many potential investors. If they mistreat someone they work with, what would do to the rest who are just numbers on a list? There for I expect a mutually agreed upon settlement. Where in the respect for each others interests, the terms will be kept private. Catherine stayed on while others dropped their insider status at a lot higher price. Which allowed them to sell all or part of their holdings if they chose to do so, without reporting. No one would really know. With Ms. Henderson staying on as CFO, had she reported dumping her holdings at 60 cents. It would not have changed the value of the company. But could well have caused an undesirable reaction in share price. Certainly pressure for a person in that position. Then it appears, she never resigned or retired but was involuntarily replaced. Perhaps there are prevailing circumstances average shareholders are not now or ever will be aware of.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next