SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 165.13+1.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (6681)12/23/1997 6:32:00 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Maurice, you are right in that any photon, or nuclear size particle can cause changes in living cell DNA. When the affected cell divides it most likely dies, but if not, can survive in a changed non useful form. As this non-useful cell continues to multiply, cancer is born. Cells have to do a lot of multiplying before they begin to damage the body. Fortunately, or unfortunately, this takes years in most cases. The only way to determine if "the proposed cause" of the cancer is the problem is to do a statistical analysis of people suffering from the cancer, and relate it to exposure to a similar "proposed cause."

The studies I've have seen related to electric power lines show no statistical increase in the incidence of cancer among people exposed to electric fields. That doesn't mean that some cancers aren't initiated by them, just that the risk is similar to other environmental conditions.

However, on the radiated tomato front, zapped tomatoes are no more radioactive after being blasted, and therefore do not provide an "internal source" of radiation after being ingested. If a living tomato cell is mutated by the radiation, and then divides and becomes cancerous, the cancerous cells will be killed by being digested or will simply pass through the body as waste. They will not be absorbed into the body as a living cancerous cell. The only harm that could come from eating irradiated food would be if the atoms making up the food were "excited" (i.e. made radioactive) by the radiation, and remained that way until the time they were ingested, whereas they would provide a source of energy that could cause human cell damage when the tomato atom 'de-excites" by giving off an energy particle. Radioactivity is easily detected and thus "hot" tomatoes are easy to detect, and have not been found after being zapped. Extensive testing has shown that radiated food does not contain newly "radioactive atoms" after being exposed to the type of radiation being used to process foods, and is therefore safe for consumption.

Anyway, that's the difference between phones and tomatoes!

Caxton
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext