SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (905851)12/7/2015 9:36:34 AM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (1) of 1575121
 
Breaking; Supreme Court refuses to take up assault weapon ban.

Gun Advocates Rejected by U.S. Supreme Court on Assault Weapons

December 7, 2015 — 6:31 AM PST

Justices won't question Chicago suburb's ban on some guns

Top court avoids intensifying debate over gun control

The U.S. Supreme Court steered clear of a politically charged fight over gun rights, turning away a challenge to a law banning semi-automatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines in a Chicago suburb.

The justices left intact a federal appeals court decision that said the Highland Park, Illinois, restrictions don’t infringe on the constitutional right to bear arms. The appeals court said residents have plenty of legal self-defense options, including handguns and other types of long guns. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas voted to hear the case.

The gun-control debate has intensified in recent months amid a series of mass shootings, including the Oct. 1 rampage that left nine people dead at an Oregon community college and the Dec. 2 shooting that killed 14 people at a social services center in San Bernardino, California. Had the high court taken up the Highland Park case, the justices would have issued their ruling next year in the heat of the presidential campaign.

Gun-rights advocates have repeatedly tried and failed in recent years to get the high court to expand protections under the Second Amendment. The court hasn’t ruled in a gun-rights case since 2010.

A Highland Park resident and the Illinois State Rifle Association challenged the city’s 2013 law. They argued in their appeal that lower courts are engaging in "massive resistance" to the 2008 Supreme Court ruling that said the Constitution protects individual gun rights.

"In the seven years since that opinion was handed down, the lower courts have assiduously worked to sap it of any real meaning," the appeal argued. "They have upheld severe restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms that would be unthinkable in the context of any other constitutional right."

Seven states and the District of Columbia ban assault rifles and high-capacity magazines, as do New York City and San Francisco. About a quarter of the U.S. population lives in areas that have banned assault weapons, Highland Park said in court papers. Federal courts have consistently upheld those laws.

Among the weapons banned by Highland Park is the popular AR-15 military-style rifle. The city prohibits magazines that can accept more than 10 rounds. It enacted the ordinance in response to mass shootings in Aurora, Colorado; Newtown, Connecticut; Tucson, Arizona; and Santa Barbara, California.

Mass shootings "occur too frequently in the United States," the city argued. "It is reasonable for a municipality susceptible to such events to want to avoid even a single one."

The case is Friedman v. City of Highland Park, 15-133.

bloomberg.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext