ZEN vs CCB Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB

ZEN.V 1.000

0.0%

Dec 24 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glorieux who wrote (5436)	12/7/2015 10:28:10 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	Read Replies (2) of 5988

Glorieux, it's a specific caveat and it is an extension of previous disclosure of significantly variable results using Albany material. Did you not notice the wording "realistic" and how it was used? The problem in this case is not a snap shot result because you can't mine snapshots. It's getting a constant out of Albany graphite when it comes to achieving stable results. Run of lab hasn't been able to achieve that yet, even Ballard acknowledges that .......... so does Chahar, it's in the recent disclosures. As for you convincing some broker to buy ............. Quincey did the same thing and that didn't work out so well for those folks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next